Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="scoop" data-source="post: 135763" data-attributes="member: 10498">Hi Tom,Why not just use C# as a language? It has very much resemblance with Java so it should be very easy for you to make the switch. Or do you really need the benefits of Java (i.e. true multi-platform support <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> )? Before I started helping with MP I always wrote in Java, and I found it very easy to make the switch. I mean, with .NET it's a matter of a refference to a particular DLL and you're ready to go. Much easier than writing again an additional remoting interface on top of the current one.Kind regards,MichelP.S.: What about PowerScheduler? Have you tested it already? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="scoop, post: 135763, member: 10498"] Hi Tom, Why not just use C# as a language? It has very much resemblance with Java so it should be very easy for you to make the switch. Or do you really need the benefits of Java (i.e. true multi-platform support ;) )? Before I started helping with MP I always wrote in Java, and I found it very easy to make the switch. I mean, with .NET it's a matter of a refference to a particular DLL and you're ready to go. Much easier than writing again an additional remoting interface on top of the current one. Kind regards, Michel P.S.: What about PowerScheduler? Have you tested it already? ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification