home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
HTPC Projects
My 56TB (and growing) file server.
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JoeSmith" data-source="post: 861285" data-attributes="member: 60415"><p>just to give you small comparison number:</p><p> </p><p>[CODE]Intel Core i5-2500</p><p> </p><p>MSI H67 Mainboard</p><p> </p><p>8GB-DRR3 Ram</p><p> </p><p>320GB System Drive</p><p> </p><p>5x2TB Samsung F2</p><p> </p><p>TV-Card with 2xDvb-t & 2xDvb-s (that ugly thing alone takes ~10W)</p><p> </p><p>Windows Server 2008 R2 [/CODE]</p><p> </p><p>The system consumes ~ 45W when all harddrives are idle. Without the harddrives and tv-card i was able to drop the system below 20W (i think that is really an amazing number for a quad core system).</p><p>The hds are only used for 1-3h a day so they are set to spin down after 30minutes. i know that it is probably not the best for the drives as start/stop cycles are more dangerous than running all the time but i guess 1-2 stop cycles a day won't break them that fast. Usually i tend to keep them until the bigger drives get cheaper but since the flood that plan hasn't worked out.</p><p> </p><p>If you plan to get a good cpu with low power consumption you might take a look at the new ivy bridge cpus from intel as they are pin compatible to sandy bridge and even use less power.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>By spinning down the drives and using a smaller energy hungry cpu you could save some power. In my area 270W running 24/7 would be nearly 500€ / year just on energy costs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JoeSmith, post: 861285, member: 60415"] just to give you small comparison number: [CODE]Intel Core i5-2500 MSI H67 Mainboard 8GB-DRR3 Ram 320GB System Drive 5x2TB Samsung F2 TV-Card with 2xDvb-t & 2xDvb-s (that ugly thing alone takes ~10W) Windows Server 2008 R2 [/CODE] The system consumes ~ 45W when all harddrives are idle. Without the harddrives and tv-card i was able to drop the system below 20W (i think that is really an amazing number for a quad core system). The hds are only used for 1-3h a day so they are set to spin down after 30minutes. i know that it is probably not the best for the drives as start/stop cycles are more dangerous than running all the time but i guess 1-2 stop cycles a day won't break them that fast. Usually i tend to keep them until the bigger drives get cheaper but since the flood that plan hasn't worked out. If you plan to get a good cpu with low power consumption you might take a look at the new ivy bridge cpus from intel as they are pin compatible to sandy bridge and even use less power. By spinning down the drives and using a smaller energy hungry cpu you could save some power. In my area 270W running 24/7 would be nearly 500€ / year just on energy costs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
HTPC Projects
My 56TB (and growing) file server.
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom