Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zeflash" data-source="post: 80653" data-attributes="member: 13641">I agree with Patrick, if multiple people want to participate in the plugin's development, we need to have the sources somewhere (SF sounds good).Edit:In fact, I took the liberty of submitting a project registration request in SF - I used the GPL license. Hope everyone's fine with this. Given the request could take up to 2 days to be processed, you have time to protest until&nbsp; I start checking code in <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I intend to use SVN by the way - it's much more efficient than CVS.Multiple coders means compromises though - we would need to agree on where the dev should go, how we should do things, etc.But I believe that in the end it's the best way to have a project that grows steadily.Waiting to get in touch with WeeToddDid!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zeflash, post: 80653, member: 13641"] I agree with Patrick, if multiple people want to participate in the plugin's development, we need to have the sources somewhere (SF sounds good). Edit: In fact, I took the liberty of submitting a project registration request in SF - I used the GPL license. Hope everyone's fine with this. Given the request could take up to 2 days to be processed, you have time to protest until I start checking code in :) I intend to use SVN by the way - it's much more efficient than CVS. Multiple coders means compromises though - we would need to agree on where the dev should go, how we should do things, etc. But I believe that in the end it's the best way to have a project that grows steadily. Waiting to get in touch with WeeToddDid! [/QUOTE]

Verification