home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
NAS might be the bottleneck
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1103279" data-attributes="member: 82144"><p>Hello Michael</p><p></p><p>Personally I would never recommend recording or timeshifting directly to or from a NAS. The additional latency and potential inconsistency in accessing the NAS over the network can be problematic at times. Moving recordings to the NAS after they're completed is fine. Just wouldn't recommend <em>direct </em>recording to the NAS. Try an old HDD for recording, and consider a RAMdisk for timeshifting.</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p>mm</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1103279, member: 82144"] Hello Michael Personally I would never recommend recording or timeshifting directly to or from a NAS. The additional latency and potential inconsistency in accessing the NAS over the network can be problematic at times. Moving recordings to the NAS after they're completed is fine. Just wouldn't recommend [I]direct [/I]recording to the NAS. Try an old HDD for recording, and consider a RAMdisk for timeshifting. Regards, mm [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
NAS might be the bottleneck
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
