Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SteveV" data-source="post: 53651" data-attributes="member: 15481">Mike,This would be a database view so yes, we'd be retrieving the album info from the the db.&nbsp; However, each artist in the list could have as many albums as can fit on the list control item, say 10-12 thumbnails per item.&nbsp; The list control itself contains 12 - 14 items depending on how it's layed out.&nbsp; 12 * 14 = 168 thumbnails worst caseThe current views have 1 thumbnail per list item: 14 thumbnails worst case.I'm not saying it's not possible just that it *will* be slower.&nbsp; I'm of the opinion that it's already too slow&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite16" alt=":cry:" title="Crying&nbsp; &nbsp; :cry:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cry:" /> .&nbsp; So, until I can come up with a better way to quickly access the thumbnails, I don't want to sink a ton of time trying to get it to work--need to put a little more thought into it. Hope this makes sense.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SteveV, post: 53651, member: 15481"] Mike, This would be a database view so yes, we'd be retrieving the album info from the the db. However, each artist in the list could have as many albums as can fit on the list control item, say 10-12 thumbnails per item. The list control itself contains 12 - 14 items depending on how it's layed out. 12 * 14 = 168 thumbnails worst case The current views have 1 thumbnail per list item: 14 thumbnails worst case. I'm not saying it's not possible just that it *will* be slower. I'm of the opinion that it's already too slow :cry: . So, until I can come up with a better way to quickly access the thumbnails, I don't want to sink a ton of time trying to get it to work--need to put a little more thought into it. Hope this makes sense. [/QUOTE]

Verification