home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
New Webinterface
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bram" data-source="post: 128920" data-attributes="member: 17179"><p>For more information about Mono...</p><p><a href="http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.2/" target="_blank">http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.2/</a></p><p>A new version was released this week.</p><p></p><p>You may call it nonsens. But I have heard no one say the TVengine3 will be the new standard (not now, not in the future). Even not when specificly asked for. The answer is always, that it might or might not be.</p><p>Supporting two webinterfaces and communication layers sounds like a lot more work then implement support for the 'old' tvengine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bram, post: 128920, member: 17179"] For more information about Mono... [url]http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.2/[/url] A new version was released this week. You may call it nonsens. But I have heard no one say the TVengine3 will be the new standard (not now, not in the future). Even not when specificly asked for. The answer is always, that it might or might not be. Supporting two webinterfaces and communication layers sounds like a lot more work then implement support for the 'old' tvengine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
New Webinterface
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
