home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
New Webinterface
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dvdfreak" data-source="post: 166943" data-attributes="member: 21313"><p>The advantage of using WCF is that communication can be quite a bit more efficient. Unfortunately, this will only work from another WCF client, a web service client would be slower again. But as you talk about ASP.NET obviously this would mean the transfer <u>will</u> will be fast! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>And let's not forget that the data needs to be transferred from server to client anyway, even with a direct database access the data is transferred over the network, so it's not <u>that</u> big a deal that it is serialized over XML. In the end, a good web interface is what will make it snappy. Getting the guide data as needed for example, while the user it navigating through the guide will be better than trying to get everything beforehand for example.</p><p></p><p>Just my two cents <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I just wish that I had more free time to work on the scheduler service, it <em>is</em> progressing but I'd like to get something into alpha or beta state so I could get some more real feedback on this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dvdfreak, post: 166943, member: 21313"] The advantage of using WCF is that communication can be quite a bit more efficient. Unfortunately, this will only work from another WCF client, a web service client would be slower again. But as you talk about ASP.NET obviously this would mean the transfer [u]will[/u] will be fast! :) And let's not forget that the data needs to be transferred from server to client anyway, even with a direct database access the data is transferred over the network, so it's not [u]that[/u] big a deal that it is serialized over XML. In the end, a good web interface is what will make it snappy. Getting the guide data as needed for example, while the user it navigating through the guide will be better than trying to get everything beforehand for example. Just my two cents :) I just wish that I had more free time to work on the scheduler service, it [i]is[/i] progressing but I'd like to get something into alpha or beta state so I could get some more real feedback on this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
New Webinterface
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom