home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
Newbie, refugee from Vista WMC Rovi Guide fiasco
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1146725" data-attributes="member: 82144"><p>Great! Whatever works for you... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, MP doesn't support channel numbers in that [ATSC] format. ATSC is the only standard in the world that doesn't use simple numbers. <sigh></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm based in New Zealand, so I don't have actually have cause to use either of them.</p><p>Anecdotally, the quality of guide data available from a given service can vary from area to area. So, some people may find one service gives them better data while other people find the opposite.</p><p>I suppose that scraping zap2it is not particularly ethical (possibly prohibited by Ts and Cs etc.). It also has the same weaknesses all scrapers have in that they can break if/when zap2it change their data/website format... and this requires manual intervention by somebody (presumably the zap2xml developer(s)) to fix.</p><p>All of that is to say: I think you're best to make the choice for yourself. There's no harm in trying other services before you settle on the one you prefer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1146725, member: 82144"] Great! Whatever works for you... :) Sorry, MP doesn't support channel numbers in that [ATSC] format. ATSC is the only standard in the world that doesn't use simple numbers. <sigh> I'm based in New Zealand, so I don't have actually have cause to use either of them. Anecdotally, the quality of guide data available from a given service can vary from area to area. So, some people may find one service gives them better data while other people find the opposite. I suppose that scraping zap2it is not particularly ethical (possibly prohibited by Ts and Cs etc.). It also has the same weaknesses all scrapers have in that they can break if/when zap2it change their data/website format... and this requires manual intervention by somebody (presumably the zap2xml developer(s)) to fix. All of that is to say: I think you're best to make the choice for yourself. There's no harm in trying other services before you settle on the one you prefer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
Newbie, refugee from Vista WMC Rovi Guide fiasco
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom