Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1197342" data-attributes="member: 82144">Hello <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Well, in terms of I/O speed, SSDs have higher latency and lower bandwidth than RAM. In short: they're slower. Therefore you would expect that channel switching times and seeking (rewind, fast-forward, seek/step) would be slower with an SSD... but I can't tell you how much slower. You would have to test that yourself. The difference could be insignificant/unnoticeable.&quot;Rewind time&quot; depends on the size of the time-shift buffer. Assuming that your SSD is larger than your RAM drive, you should be able to have a larger time-shift buffer. Therefore, yes, you should be able to use it to have longer &quot;rewind time&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1197342, member: 82144"] Hello :) Well, in terms of I/O speed, SSDs have higher latency and lower bandwidth than RAM. In short: they're slower. Therefore you would expect that channel switching times and seeking (rewind, fast-forward, seek/step) would be slower with an SSD... but I can't tell you how much slower. You would have to test that yourself. The difference could be insignificant/unnoticeable. "Rewind time" depends on the size of the time-shift buffer. Assuming that your SSD is larger than your RAM drive, you should be able to have a larger time-shift buffer. Therefore, yes, you should be able to use it to have longer "rewind time". [/QUOTE]

Verification