Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lehmden" data-source="post: 1190677" data-attributes="member: 109222">Hi.I don't mean this as a general thing, only as an option for weak network connections...Yes, it would. Not that nice but the only way I can imagine if there is no faster network available. Think about all those &quot;Computer Sticks&quot; that don't have any other connection than WLan... Those sticks are more and more common those days.Isn't it a lot better to delay playback start than not be able to play media at all or this massive amount of stutter that now happens in such cases? When I start a YouTube video I also have to wait some time before playback starts (as I have a slow internet connection). And even with buffer it happens every now and then that I need to wait in the middle of the playback for the buffer to be refilled again. So people are used to this, especially if they have played some YouTube videos on cellphone while not connected to a WLan.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lehmden, post: 1190677, member: 109222"] Hi. I don't mean this as a general thing, only as an option for weak network connections... Yes, it would. Not that nice but the only way I can imagine if there is no faster network available. Think about all those "Computer Sticks" that don't have any other connection than WLan... Those sticks are more and more common those days. Isn't it a lot better to delay playback start than not be able to play media at all or this massive amount of stutter that now happens in such cases? When I start a YouTube video I also have to wait some time before playback starts (as I have a slow internet connection). And even with buffer it happens every now and then that I need to wait in the middle of the playback for the buffer to be refilled again. So people are used to this, especially if they have played some YouTube videos on cellphone while not connected to a WLan. [/QUOTE]

Verification