Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="joz" data-source="post: 513878" data-attributes="member: 70244">Maybe I'm totally missing the ball here but wouldn't this be a better strategy?:Have the multiimage load one image in advance like tourettes is suggesting but also not just discard others but have some memory limitation on them. This way more images can stay into memory which ultimately means less diskusage and faster display? Maybe I'm missing something obvious.To extend on this, streamedMP uses a multiimage for each menu entry. So then MP will dictate that all multiimages together will use up x defined memory (say 500MB). It counts the multiimages, say 10 and divides them by amount of available mem, which then is 50MB per multiimage instance.Now that would be a huge improvement performance wise over longer periods of time. But again maybe I'm missing something obvious and also maybe a little bit of overkill to this problem.Don't get me wrong, I'll be happy with any solution, currently there's none <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="joz, post: 513878, member: 70244"] Maybe I'm totally missing the ball here but wouldn't this be a better strategy?: Have the multiimage load one image in advance like tourettes is suggesting but also not just discard others but have some memory limitation on them. This way more images can stay into memory which ultimately means less diskusage and faster display? Maybe I'm missing something obvious. To extend on this, streamedMP uses a multiimage for each menu entry. So then MP will dictate that all multiimages together will use up x defined memory (say 500MB). It counts the multiimages, say 10 and divides them by amount of available mem, which then is 50MB per multiimage instance. Now that would be a huge improvement performance wise over longer periods of time. But again maybe I'm missing something obvious and also maybe a little bit of overkill to this problem. Don't get me wrong, I'll be happy with any solution, currently there's none :) [/QUOTE]

Verification