home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
Poll - Hauppauge MediaMVP Support
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TritonT" data-source="post: 154882" data-attributes="member: 26020"><p>For MP to have thin client support don't these things have to happen first:</p><p></p><p>1. The TV Server has to become a media server holding all the databases that the standalone MP currently holds.</p><p></p><p>2. The TV Server has to get a upnp plugin to talk to a range of thin clients not just the MediaMVP.</p><p></p><p>3. The TV Server has to get a media transcoding plugin to convert on-the-fly to whatever format each of the supported thin clients is capable of playing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The idea of having thin client support is great, but I for one wouldn't choose the MVP, for a start it has no HD capability or dvi/hdmi connection.</p><p></p><p>If it was audio I wanted I'd choose the TerraTec Noxon2.</p><p></p><p>If it was video I wanted I'd choose the D-Link DSM-520.</p><p></p><p>And if I wanted to respect the origins of MediaPortal I'd choose an XBMC on XBox!!!</p><p></p><p>At the minute MediaPortal isn’t even a client to ‘a Mediaportal server’, so isn’t this thread jumping the gun a bit!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TritonT, post: 154882, member: 26020"] For MP to have thin client support don't these things have to happen first: 1. The TV Server has to become a media server holding all the databases that the standalone MP currently holds. 2. The TV Server has to get a upnp plugin to talk to a range of thin clients not just the MediaMVP. 3. The TV Server has to get a media transcoding plugin to convert on-the-fly to whatever format each of the supported thin clients is capable of playing. The idea of having thin client support is great, but I for one wouldn't choose the MVP, for a start it has no HD capability or dvi/hdmi connection. If it was audio I wanted I'd choose the TerraTec Noxon2. If it was video I wanted I'd choose the D-Link DSM-520. And if I wanted to respect the origins of MediaPortal I'd choose an XBMC on XBox!!! At the minute MediaPortal isn’t even a client to ‘a Mediaportal server’, so isn’t this thread jumping the gun a bit! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
Poll - Hauppauge MediaMVP Support
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom