home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
Poll: What media center software do you use? Vote for MediaPortal!
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dadeo" data-source="post: 602090" data-attributes="member: 27204"><p>Hey capitalf, thanks for that link to the FLOSS comparison! Yes, that is pretty close to what I meant. I remember seeing the link, but disregarded it as the data is over two years old. However, I would agree that would be a good foundation to build on. I think there was a bit of over emphasis on Linux solutions. The All-in-One solutions are all Linux OS I believe. However, that is only fair since they are FLOSS after all! </p><p></p><p>The comparison lacked in technical depth. That is not meant as a criticism, as they did better than anyone else has imo. It is just something that can be improved. For example, even in Audio playback, I am not sure if the average new user realizes the difference in quality between a media center that simply supports MP3 playback or one which offers FLAC, AAC, not to mention options like setting output levels, fading tracks in and out, crossover, gapless playback, up-mixing stereo to 5.1 or 7.1 and setting buffer size; DSP (Digital Signal Processing) and FX options for Gain and Compression. Of course, MP offers all the above <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> as well as the ability to incorporate Winamp and VST plugins. </p><p></p><p>There can also be a huge variation on the <strong>level</strong> of visualization support. So it is not really enough to just say a media center supports a feature, such as visualizations. </p><p></p><p>Plus, for software that runs on more than one OS, the level of support for a feature can vary on each OS. So it's not an easy job to tackle! I wish you luck, and if I can help you in any way, feel free to send me a Private Message.</p><p></p><p>The good news is, you could easily do a series of comparison articles <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> - one on each feature 'area' - like Music, TV, Video, Pictures, Radio, Weather, etc., and an overview. Content galore! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dadeo, post: 602090, member: 27204"] Hey capitalf, thanks for that link to the FLOSS comparison! Yes, that is pretty close to what I meant. I remember seeing the link, but disregarded it as the data is over two years old. However, I would agree that would be a good foundation to build on. I think there was a bit of over emphasis on Linux solutions. The All-in-One solutions are all Linux OS I believe. However, that is only fair since they are FLOSS after all! The comparison lacked in technical depth. That is not meant as a criticism, as they did better than anyone else has imo. It is just something that can be improved. For example, even in Audio playback, I am not sure if the average new user realizes the difference in quality between a media center that simply supports MP3 playback or one which offers FLAC, AAC, not to mention options like setting output levels, fading tracks in and out, crossover, gapless playback, up-mixing stereo to 5.1 or 7.1 and setting buffer size; DSP (Digital Signal Processing) and FX options for Gain and Compression. Of course, MP offers all the above :D as well as the ability to incorporate Winamp and VST plugins. There can also be a huge variation on the [B]level[/B] of visualization support. So it is not really enough to just say a media center supports a feature, such as visualizations. Plus, for software that runs on more than one OS, the level of support for a feature can vary on each OS. So it's not an easy job to tackle! I wish you luck, and if I can help you in any way, feel free to send me a Private Message. The good news is, you could easily do a series of comparison articles ;) - one on each feature 'area' - like Music, TV, Video, Pictures, Radio, Weather, etc., and an overview. Content galore! :P [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
Poll: What media center software do you use? Vote for MediaPortal!
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom