Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Wall" data-source="post: 1079123" data-attributes="member: 125233">This post helps understand which mock framework is better when searching for a Typemock replacement (specifically best support for &quot;moles (shims)&quot;:<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9677445/mock-framework-vs-ms-fakes-frameworks" target="_blank">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9677445/mock-framework-vs-ms-fakes-frameworks</a>Typemock seems like it was one of a kind in the past, so an understandable choice (then). Looking for an MS standard leads to their Fakes Framework which unfortunately is now a premium product (available only in Visual Studio Premium or Ultimate editions).Jim Cooper makes some good points (in that Stack Overflow post) against NMock, along with examples. So that rules itself out too. Looks like it's down to Rhino Mocks or Moq (or something else I find on the way).Searching...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Wall, post: 1079123, member: 125233"] This post helps understand which mock framework is better when searching for a Typemock replacement (specifically best support for "moles (shims)": [url]http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9677445/mock-framework-vs-ms-fakes-frameworks[/url] Typemock seems like it was one of a kind in the past, so an understandable choice (then). Looking for an MS standard leads to their Fakes Framework which unfortunately is now a premium product (available only in Visual Studio Premium or Ultimate editions). Jim Cooper makes some good points (in that Stack Overflow post) against NMock, along with examples. So that rules itself out too. Looks like it's down to Rhino Mocks or Moq (or something else I find on the way). Searching... [/QUOTE]

Verification