Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Wall" data-source="post: 1079136" data-attributes="member: 125233">Okay I think I've read enough now to invest time migrating to XUnit.NET, Moq and AutoFixture (including it's own Moq extension). Mocking test data will be provided by AutoFixture and interception/isolation of dependencies (a.k.a. shims/moles/dynamic-proxies) is Moq's thing.In my opinion the choice between Moq and RhinoMocks is won by Moq mainly because of it's simpler coding style but also because it appears to be more of a pure .NET open source project whereas the hibernatingrhinos.com (RhinoMock) web site clearly has a commercial product first approach (no better than Typemock then). There was another called FakeItEasy which has a simple and fun approach but I get the feeling that Moq is more professional.[USER=106003]@FreakyJ[/USER] - Yes I want to propagate this to all the solutions. Hopefully it's straightforward with experience gained from the first conversion. If not for others at least for my own confidence that I am building everything correctly (the internals appear to be working) before submitting patches. I hope the main developers agree and don't just reject my changes <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Wall, post: 1079136, member: 125233"] Okay I think I've read enough now to invest time migrating to XUnit.NET, Moq and AutoFixture (including it's own Moq extension). Mocking test data will be provided by AutoFixture and interception/isolation of dependencies (a.k.a. shims/moles/dynamic-proxies) is Moq's thing. In my opinion the choice between Moq and RhinoMocks is won by Moq mainly because of it's simpler coding style but also because it appears to be more of a pure .NET open source project whereas the hibernatingrhinos.com (RhinoMock) web site clearly has a commercial product first approach (no better than Typemock then). There was another called FakeItEasy which has a simple and fun approach but I get the feeling that Moq is more professional. [USER=106003]@FreakyJ[/USER] - Yes I want to propagate this to all the solutions. Hopefully it's straightforward with experience gained from the first conversion. If not for others at least for my own confidence that I am building everything correctly (the internals appear to be working) before submitting patches. I hope the main developers agree and don't just reject my changes :-) [/QUOTE]

Verification