Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DieBagger" data-source="post: 651885" data-attributes="member: 56421">I must have missed that, to be honest while the idea of webservices as a way to interact with MediaPortal is great, the implementation of gemx was a little to basic and unstable imo. Also it seemed like he had a lot on his plate and didn't have time to improve the webservices. This is why I started to rewrite the webservices (based on the great work of gemx).Webservices are great for things like getting a list of your videos/music/tv-series/..., which is where I put my focus for now. For things like emulating a remote control (where you need to send small packets fast and get a response fast), the lag produced by the webservice overhead could be a problem.Shukuyen I contacted you via pm, we should definately talk <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="DieBagger, post: 651885, member: 56421"] I must have missed that, to be honest while the idea of webservices as a way to interact with MediaPortal is great, the implementation of gemx was a little to basic and unstable imo. Also it seemed like he had a lot on his plate and didn't have time to improve the webservices. This is why I started to rewrite the webservices (based on the great work of gemx). Webservices are great for things like getting a list of your videos/music/tv-series/..., which is where I put my focus for now. For things like emulating a remote control (where you need to send small packets fast and get a response fast), the lag produced by the webservice overhead could be a problem. Shukuyen I contacted you via pm, we should definately talk ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification