Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="taalas" data-source="post: 585032" data-attributes="member: 90199">Re: SAF v5.00 experimental (based on FFDShow DXVA decoder)Hi Hoborg,I wanted to write up something on ReClock yesterday but Seeco beat me to it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />I used ReClock back with my old TV set which wasn't capable of displaying 24p natively and the stuttering from my TVs time interpolation made me dizzy. With ReClock I sped up the source material to 50Hz which worked very well (for most viewers the speedup isn't noticeable without direct comparison - actually most material is sped up for PAL TV). It had some glitches though as well...sometimes it would start stuttering even worse than without reclocking and I had to press pause/play to get it to behave again...All in all I think ReClock is a great tool and worth to be included...but definitely make it optional like you did with VobSub etc.taalas</blockquote>

[QUOTE="taalas, post: 585032, member: 90199"] [b]Re: SAF v5.00 experimental (based on FFDShow DXVA decoder)[/b] Hi Hoborg, I wanted to write up something on ReClock yesterday but Seeco beat me to it ;) I used ReClock back with my old TV set which wasn't capable of displaying 24p natively and the stuttering from my TVs time interpolation made me dizzy. With ReClock I sped up the source material to 50Hz which worked very well (for most viewers the speedup isn't noticeable without direct comparison - actually most material is sped up for PAL TV). It had some glitches though as well...sometimes it would start stuttering even worse than without reclocking and I had to press pause/play to get it to behave again... All in all I think ReClock is a great tool and worth to be included...but definitely make it optional like you did with VobSub etc. taalas [/QUOTE]

Verification