Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UNOPARATOR" data-source="post: 767981" data-attributes="member: 56815">Re: SAF v6.00 (based on LAVF)First of all please don't take this the wrong way. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />I know that you only update SAF v6.00 for some time now, but it would be really nice to see the above changes in SAF v5.x too.I can't risk running into issues using SAF v6.0 (I don't know if it would but it is a risk) while SAF v5.02 works 97.5% without problems. (I don't know if updating v5.x would solve my 2.5% or not) <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />Also <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> for all your hard work so far...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UNOPARATOR, post: 767981, member: 56815"] [b]Re: SAF v6.00 (based on LAVF)[/b] First of all please don't take this the wrong way. :D I know that you only update SAF v6.00 for some time now, but it would be really nice to see the above changes in SAF v5.x too. I can't risk running into issues using SAF v6.0 (I don't know if it would but it is a risk) while SAF v5.02 works 97.5% without problems. (I don't know if updating v5.x would solve my 2.5% or not) :D Also :thx: for all your hard work so far... [/QUOTE]

Verification