home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Software
Codecs
SAF v6 (based on LAVF)
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 775604" data-attributes="member: 10858"><p><strong>Re: SAF v6.00 (based on LAVF)</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Gets completely off topic <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>In some past thread I have already stated few facts that make those comparisions pretty useless - one is that postprocessing is usually ruining the picture (it can help in cases when you have already really bad source material - for Bluray content it is usually just pointless). </p><p></p><p>There are also other things like driver quality to be considered (and codec compatibility). ATI is behind on those two currently (year ago they were in par with Nvidia on the driver quality). </p><p></p><p>But, please open a new thread to discuss (with biased opinions like all have when it comes to ATI/Nvidia/Intel <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />). This thread is no place for such discussion. We should collect all the current facts to some one place in wiki (and keep it up to date) to reduce the times when the same issue pops up in the random video related threads. </p><p></p><p>Something to collect to the wiki (or forum thread) - this is not a small task by any means:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Driver versions - compatibility issues / bugs / features / issues with MP</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Driver stability on different configurations</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> HW generations - compatibility issues / bugs / features / HW acceleration support per format / issues with MP</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Support by codecs</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Quality test results (with possibility to exclude the postprocessing all together - since this depends on the users need / material used)</li> </ul><p></p><p>but in any case, please we need to keep this thread clean from this - it is quite big without such discussion already <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 775604, member: 10858"] [b]Re: SAF v6.00 (based on LAVF)[/b] Gets completely off topic :) In some past thread I have already stated few facts that make those comparisions pretty useless - one is that postprocessing is usually ruining the picture (it can help in cases when you have already really bad source material - for Bluray content it is usually just pointless). There are also other things like driver quality to be considered (and codec compatibility). ATI is behind on those two currently (year ago they were in par with Nvidia on the driver quality). But, please open a new thread to discuss (with biased opinions like all have when it comes to ATI/Nvidia/Intel :)). This thread is no place for such discussion. We should collect all the current facts to some one place in wiki (and keep it up to date) to reduce the times when the same issue pops up in the random video related threads. Something to collect to the wiki (or forum thread) - this is not a small task by any means: [list] [*] Driver versions - compatibility issues / bugs / features / issues with MP [*] Driver stability on different configurations [*] HW generations - compatibility issues / bugs / features / HW acceleration support per format / issues with MP [*] Support by codecs [*] Quality test results (with possibility to exclude the postprocessing all together - since this depends on the users need / material used) [/list] but in any case, please we need to keep this thread clean from this - it is quite big without such discussion already :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Software
Codecs
SAF v6 (based on LAVF)
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
