Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="alegend" data-source="post: 833833" data-attributes="member: 116320">AW: Re: AW: SAF v6 (based on LAVF)to make it short...file opening takes ages again - i cant use this.i installed ffdshow and lav alone and no problems like this appear!I tried to use DXVA with ffdshow as the cpu usage is still ess then intels quicksync but I get judders in picture - not much and hardly to recognize but it is there.then i tried quicksync with FFDSHOW and i tget same result like when i use lav with quicksynci already postet theis but here it is again <a href="http://www.sendspace.com/file/58tequ" target="_blank">Download VIDEO0023.3gp from Sendspace.com - send big files the easy way</a>The only thing which works without judders is lav video codec - it runs smooth only thing is that I have much higher cpu usage...DXVA gives me around 6%&nbsp; With lav I get around 15-18%Anyone a clue why the DXVA with ffdshow gives me judders??</blockquote>

[QUOTE="alegend, post: 833833, member: 116320"] [b]AW: Re: AW: SAF v6 (based on LAVF)[/b] to make it short... file opening takes ages again - i cant use this. i installed ffdshow and lav alone and no problems like this appear! I tried to use DXVA with ffdshow as the cpu usage is still ess then intels quicksync but I get judders in picture - not much and hardly to recognize but it is there. then i tried quicksync with FFDSHOW and i tget same result like when i use lav with quicksync i already postet theis but here it is again [url=http://www.sendspace.com/file/58tequ]Download VIDEO0023.3gp from Sendspace.com - send big files the easy way[/url] The only thing which works without judders is lav video codec - it runs smooth only thing is that I have much higher cpu usage... DXVA gives me around 6% With lav I get around 15-18% Anyone a clue why the DXVA with ffdshow gives me judders?? [/QUOTE]

Verification