Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mbuzina" data-source="post: 1090041" data-attributes="member: 12382">I beg to differ ;-), we could add a left/right is always + x sec option (instead of defined steps), aka Step like WMC but the skip immediate is an MP speciality.Anyone can press up/down and skip the preferred amount. If you like, you can press up repeatedly and MP will still skip one step only. This is contrary to our expectation. So I would suggest the following procedure:Up --&gt; MP starts skipping x seconds ahead (this takes a while)Up --&gt; MP queues skip_immediate commandUp --&gt; MP queues skip_immediate commandSkipping Done --&gt; Play starts at t+xMP dequeues skip_immediate, combines them &amp; starts skipping 2x seconds ahead (this takes a while as well)...Skipping Done --&gt; Play starts a t t+3xThis does not remove any existing functionality and still handles multiple Up presses as a user would expect. Providing visual feedback would be an added bonus (+x, +2x, +3x).Clear?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mbuzina, post: 1090041, member: 12382"] I beg to differ ;-), we could add a left/right is always + x sec option (instead of defined steps), aka Step like WMC but the skip immediate is an MP speciality. Anyone can press up/down and skip the preferred amount. If you like, you can press up repeatedly and MP will still skip one step only. This is contrary to our expectation. So I would suggest the following procedure: Up --> MP starts skipping x seconds ahead (this takes a while) Up --> MP queues skip_immediate command Up --> MP queues skip_immediate command Skipping Done --> Play starts at t+x MP dequeues skip_immediate, combines them & starts skipping 2x seconds ahead (this takes a while as well) ... Skipping Done --> Play starts a t t+3x This does not remove any existing functionality and still handles multiple Up presses as a user would expect. Providing visual feedback would be an added bonus (+x, +2x, +3x). Clear? [/QUOTE]

Verification