home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
Slow graph rendering for analog card
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sourada" data-source="post: 130142" data-attributes="member: 46631"><p>And some more info:</p><p></p><p>After I reinstalled part of the Nero Ultra 7 Suite (details below), the Edit form took 168 seconds (without the code workaround). So Nero must be installing some filter(s) that are confusing to DirectShow's search. However, if I capture the filter graph in GraphEdit before executing the RenderStream, then render various pins in the graph, none of them take very long.</p><p></p><p>Nero likes DS filters; \Program Files\Common Files\Ahead includes 46 files with extension .ax. (I deleted that directory before installing the Suite again, so I know these are Nero-related files).</p><p></p><p>Now, the question is: is there something wrong with how MediaPortal sets up its graph, or is it something bad about Nero's filters? Or does it really matter, since Nero is a fact of life and it seems likely that MediaPortal can work around the situation?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's what I installed from Nero:</p><p>Burning ROM</p><p>Vision</p><p>CoverDesigner</p><p>WaveEditor</p><p>SoundTrax</p><p>Recode</p><p>CD-DVD Speed</p><p>DriveSpeed</p><p>InfoTool</p><p></p><p>But I didn't install:</p><p>Home</p><p>SmartStart</p><p>BackItUp</p><p>ShowTime</p><p>MediaHome</p><p>PhotoSnap</p><p>InCD</p><p>BurnRights</p><p>ImageDrive</p><p>Fast CD-DVD Burning Plugin</p><p>Mobile</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sourada, post: 130142, member: 46631"] And some more info: After I reinstalled part of the Nero Ultra 7 Suite (details below), the Edit form took 168 seconds (without the code workaround). So Nero must be installing some filter(s) that are confusing to DirectShow's search. However, if I capture the filter graph in GraphEdit before executing the RenderStream, then render various pins in the graph, none of them take very long. Nero likes DS filters; \Program Files\Common Files\Ahead includes 46 files with extension .ax. (I deleted that directory before installing the Suite again, so I know these are Nero-related files). Now, the question is: is there something wrong with how MediaPortal sets up its graph, or is it something bad about Nero's filters? Or does it really matter, since Nero is a fact of life and it seems likely that MediaPortal can work around the situation? Here's what I installed from Nero: Burning ROM Vision CoverDesigner WaveEditor SoundTrax Recode CD-DVD Speed DriveSpeed InfoTool But I didn't install: Home SmartStart BackItUp ShowTime MediaHome PhotoSnap InCD BurnRights ImageDrive Fast CD-DVD Burning Plugin Mobile [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
Slow graph rendering for analog card
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom