Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 687755" data-attributes="member: 82144">Tested - function for me is pretty average:- picture quality = average- video/audio sync = not good- dropped frames/jitter = average- CPU usage = medium/high - generally between 30 and 40%, but up to ~70% on some of my channelsIn my opinion, not as good as the ATI AVIVO 10.9 encoder:- picture quality = average/good- video/audio sync = reasonable- dropped frames/jitter = none, but occasional drops to low FPS- CPU usage = medium/low ~20%Subjectively, I think the Intervideo encoder from WinDVR 3 is slightly better again:- picture quality = average/good- video/audio sync = good- dropped frames/jitter = none, stable- CPU usage = medium/low ~15-25%For those who have it, the Cyberlink encoder included in the last version of Twinhan's DigitalTV (DigitalTV 3.4, encoder dated 2005, version 5.0.0.1305) is somewhere between the Hauppauge and the ATI:- picture quality = average/good- video/audio sync = good- dropped frames/jitter = some (I think this is because it tries to run at 60FPS; it should run at 50 for PAL)- CPU usage = medium ~20-30%*This encoder seems to &quot;get lost&quot; sometimes on change of channel.System setup:Intel Core2 e6600 2.4GHzWindows XP SP34GB RAM (3GB usable)MediaPortal SVN build 1.2.0bTest resolution 952x531 (windowed mode)Thank you once again <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 687755, member: 82144"] Tested - function for me is pretty average: - picture quality = average - video/audio sync = not good - dropped frames/jitter = average - CPU usage = medium/high - generally between 30 and 40%, but up to ~70% on some of my channels In my opinion, not as good as the ATI AVIVO 10.9 encoder: - picture quality = average/good - video/audio sync = reasonable - dropped frames/jitter = none, but occasional drops to low FPS - CPU usage = medium/low ~20% Subjectively, I think the Intervideo encoder from WinDVR 3 is slightly better again: - picture quality = average/good - video/audio sync = good - dropped frames/jitter = none, stable - CPU usage = medium/low ~15-25% For those who have it, the Cyberlink encoder included in the last version of Twinhan's DigitalTV (DigitalTV 3.4, encoder dated 2005, version 5.0.0.1305) is somewhere between the Hauppauge and the ATI: - picture quality = average/good - video/audio sync = good - dropped frames/jitter = some (I think this is because it tries to run at 60FPS; it should run at 50 for PAL) - CPU usage = medium ~20-30% *This encoder seems to "get lost" sometimes on change of channel. System setup: Intel Core2 e6600 2.4GHz Windows XP SP3 4GB RAM (3GB usable) MediaPortal SVN build 1.2.0b Test resolution 952x531 (windowed mode) Thank you once again :thx: [/QUOTE]

Verification