home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
Starting work on Techno Trend Premium support
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="draktheas" data-source="post: 30274" data-attributes="member: 17330"><p>I am not sticking with the DVB.NET architecture. The DVB.NET architecture has some TT API stuff mixed with some DVB.NET custom code. I am actually only going to be using the TT API wrapper code and extending that. I have started my own library, TTPremiumWrapper, that will closely mirror the DVB.NET TTAPI code, but not quite the same architecture. So it is up to JMS on whether he wants to attempt to roll it into DVB.NET, if he just wants to switch DVB.NET to use the TTPremiumWrapper under the hood, or if it is even beneficial for him to do anything with it at this point.</p><p></p><p>I am sorry I am not keeping this DVB.NET compatible, but I wanted to create a very distinct level of seperation from the TT API to any level of code above it. </p><p></p><p>I also want to state clearly that this is not meant as a slam against JMS at all. He has done a very good job of creating a workable high level API for using the TT Premium cards. But for my purposes, I needed more functionality at the lowest level possible above the C++ interface. Without the base of DVB.NET to start with, this project would have easily taken a lot longer. </p><p></p><p>Drak</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="draktheas, post: 30274, member: 17330"] I am not sticking with the DVB.NET architecture. The DVB.NET architecture has some TT API stuff mixed with some DVB.NET custom code. I am actually only going to be using the TT API wrapper code and extending that. I have started my own library, TTPremiumWrapper, that will closely mirror the DVB.NET TTAPI code, but not quite the same architecture. So it is up to JMS on whether he wants to attempt to roll it into DVB.NET, if he just wants to switch DVB.NET to use the TTPremiumWrapper under the hood, or if it is even beneficial for him to do anything with it at this point. I am sorry I am not keeping this DVB.NET compatible, but I wanted to create a very distinct level of seperation from the TT API to any level of code above it. I also want to state clearly that this is not meant as a slam against JMS at all. He has done a very good job of creating a workable high level API for using the TT Premium cards. But for my purposes, I needed more functionality at the lowest level possible above the C++ interface. Without the base of DVB.NET to start with, this project would have easily taken a lot longer. Drak [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
Starting work on Techno Trend Premium support
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom