Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ChrisOfCatford" data-source="post: 352414" data-attributes="member: 23650">Hi,I use MP with a server (with singleseat) and several clients. With all of it's faults, this setup still lets me use media in a way that no other setup really could.I love being able to centrally set things in TV server and have the clients pick up on it and just work.I hate configuring everything again and again on different clients, closing MP and getting told off by my wife and children.I think that EVERYTHING should be centrally configured through a MP server, not just TV.TV and radio logos for instance. Could these be centrally stored?Setting default groups for each client (eg. kid's TV, kitchen TV all set cenrally). &quot;No more telly for you me lad&quot; etc.Video, picture and music shares, all referenced by network names and not IP addresses, so why not configure on the server? Different permissions set per client in the style of an FTP server perhaps.weather plugin in server, 'cause you usually have client and server in different towns.I think that most things could be set in this way and the clients could then be just that and the server could, um, serve!Just some thoughts anyway.Thanks,Chris</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ChrisOfCatford, post: 352414, member: 23650"] Hi, I use MP with a server (with singleseat) and several clients. With all of it's faults, this setup still lets me use media in a way that no other setup really could. I love being able to centrally set things in TV server and have the clients pick up on it and just work. I hate configuring everything again and again on different clients, closing MP and getting told off by my wife and children. I think that EVERYTHING should be centrally configured through a MP server, not just TV. TV and radio logos for instance. Could these be centrally stored? Setting default groups for each client (eg. kid's TV, kitchen TV all set cenrally). "No more telly for you me lad" etc. Video, picture and music shares, all referenced by network names and not IP addresses, so why not configure on the server? Different permissions set per client in the style of an FTP server perhaps. weather plugin in server, 'cause you usually have client and server in different towns. I think that most things could be set in this way and the clients could then be just that and the server could, um, serve! Just some thoughts anyway. Thanks, Chris [/QUOTE]

Verification