Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 922409" data-attributes="member: 82144"><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />&nbsp;Yep, that would be correct.&nbsp;Not a problem. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp;I'd be interested to know if you find anything.You may have noticed the additional channel information in this build logged in the tv.log file for each channel found in the scan (eg. networks, bouquets, languages, HD/SD etc.). I intend to use these to improve automatic channel grouping and other such things.Scanning may also be a little faster... but I've still got some work to do in this area.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 922409, member: 82144"] :D Yep, that would be correct. Not a problem. :) I'd be interested to know if you find anything. You may have noticed the additional channel information in this build logged in the tv.log file for each channel found in the scan (eg. networks, bouquets, languages, HD/SD etc.). I intend to use these to improve automatic channel grouping and other such things. Scanning may also be a little faster... but I've still got some work to do in this area. [/QUOTE]

Verification