Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mbuzina" data-source="post: 66974" data-attributes="member: 12382">Smirnuff: I think dawginit meant combining both the Wave &amp; the Global Volume so that you get a larger range of volume levels. Each level is 256 values (from 0 - 255), combining these would give you 64K Levels. You would still set this to a logarithmic scale, because the steps are larger in the lower volume area. So you would have (sample):%&nbsp; &nbsp; Log&nbsp; &nbsp; Scaled&nbsp; &nbsp; Wave/Sys Vol0%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.00000&nbsp; &nbsp; 0&nbsp; &nbsp; 010%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.04139&nbsp; &nbsp; 9011&nbsp; &nbsp; 9420%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.07918&nbsp; &nbsp; 17238&nbsp; &nbsp; 13130%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.11394&nbsp; &nbsp; 24806&nbsp; &nbsp; 15740%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.14613&nbsp; &nbsp; 31812&nbsp; &nbsp; 17850%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.17609&nbsp; &nbsp; 38336&nbsp; &nbsp; 19560%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.20412&nbsp; &nbsp; 44437&nbsp; &nbsp; 21070%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.23045&nbsp; &nbsp; 50169&nbsp; &nbsp; 22380%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.25527&nbsp; &nbsp; 55573&nbsp; &nbsp; 23590%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.27875&nbsp; &nbsp; 60685&nbsp; &nbsp; 246100%&nbsp; &nbsp; 0.30103&nbsp; &nbsp; 65535&nbsp; &nbsp; 255(probably not only 10% incr. but more).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mbuzina, post: 66974, member: 12382"] Smirnuff: I think dawginit meant combining both the Wave & the Global Volume so that you get a larger range of volume levels. Each level is 256 values (from 0 - 255), combining these would give you 64K Levels. You would still set this to a logarithmic scale, because the steps are larger in the lower volume area. So you would have (sample): % Log Scaled Wave/Sys Vol 0% 0.00000 0 0 10% 0.04139 9011 94 20% 0.07918 17238 131 30% 0.11394 24806 157 40% 0.14613 31812 178 50% 0.17609 38336 195 60% 0.20412 44437 210 70% 0.23045 50169 223 80% 0.25527 55573 235 90% 0.27875 60685 246 100% 0.30103 65535 255 (probably not only 10% incr. but more). [/QUOTE]

Verification