home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
why are the requirements so high?!?!
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xenon2000" data-source="post: 8769"><p>I guess I will continue to use Meedio on the digital media frame (laptop 500mhz inside 16x20 picture frame on wall).</p><p></p><p>I look forward contining to use MP on my AMD 2000 HTPC.</p><p></p><p>I also hope that MP will be able to keep up with the speed of comparible media software that currently cost money.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for clarifing the goals of MP. Though I was hoping that MP would be a more versatile platform. I am just surprised due to how fast XP and meedio are on a 500mhz laptop with 2x onboard AGP video. </p><p></p><p>I am just not prepared to spend $1000 on a new laptop to rip it apart for a custom frame like the one I have now. Especially since I know 500mhz is plenty for slideshows, MP3s, and Divx AVIs. Which is what my media frame is all about.</p><p></p><p>MP is still a great opensource project and I look forward to it's continued progress. Thanks again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xenon2000, post: 8769"] I guess I will continue to use Meedio on the digital media frame (laptop 500mhz inside 16x20 picture frame on wall). I look forward contining to use MP on my AMD 2000 HTPC. I also hope that MP will be able to keep up with the speed of comparible media software that currently cost money. Thanks for clarifing the goals of MP. Though I was hoping that MP would be a more versatile platform. I am just surprised due to how fast XP and meedio are on a 500mhz laptop with 2x onboard AGP video. I am just not prepared to spend $1000 on a new laptop to rip it apart for a custom frame like the one I have now. Especially since I know 500mhz is plenty for slideshows, MP3s, and Divx AVIs. Which is what my media frame is all about. MP is still a great opensource project and I look forward to it's continued progress. Thanks again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
why are the requirements so high?!?!
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
