Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Micropolis" data-source="post: 819528" data-attributes="member: 96567">Re: WorldWeather plugin v0.2.5 for MediaPortal v1.2.0 or higherHello Dadeo,your statement points to a very critical part of this plugin.Inside the original weather plugin it was easy to match the condition to images, because there was a 1:1 relation. Google API does not support all well known conditions, the granularity is not high enough. Because of this, only a subset can be matched directly (e.g. Smoke, Haze and others match to the same). This results in a description like &quot;Chance of rain/Showers/Smoke/Haze&quot;. The only chance to get better results is to use a weather provider with higher granularity and matching factor.@all: after fixing the longitude/latitude bug I had found a serious calculation problem for sunrise/sunset. I'm aware of this, the same routines works in my WorldClock plugin correctly. So I hope, it is not complicated to fix this today in the evening.Cheers, Micropolis</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Micropolis, post: 819528, member: 96567"] [b]Re: WorldWeather plugin v0.2.5 for MediaPortal v1.2.0 or higher[/b] Hello Dadeo, your statement points to a very critical part of this plugin. Inside the original weather plugin it was easy to match the condition to images, because there was a 1:1 relation. Google API does not support all well known conditions, the granularity is not high enough. Because of this, only a subset can be matched directly (e.g. Smoke, Haze and others match to the same). This results in a description like "Chance of rain/Showers/Smoke/Haze". The only chance to get better results is to use a weather provider with higher granularity and matching factor. @all: after fixing the longitude/latitude bug I had found a serious calculation problem for sunrise/sunset. I'm aware of this, the same routines works in my WorldClock plugin correctly. So I hope, it is not complicated to fix this today in the evening. Cheers, Micropolis [/QUOTE]

Verification