Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="helsten2" data-source="post: 925792" data-attributes="member: 89973">Possible bug in the History graph calculation - see screenshot. MAX=13, MIN=8 but the graph shows around 5.5 as average - which is impossible. It has to be between 8 and 13, right? Or have I misinterpreted the graph?I guess it could also be an error in the data feed from the provider.[ATTACH=full]113299[/ATTACH]&nbsp;EDIT:I did some more investigation - basically checked the provider data. So I can see there is no calculations done - so no bug <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />As far as I can see Average MAX is used in the chart for 2008 and Mean Temperature for the other years (which I think is correct).&nbsp;[ATTACH=full]113301[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="helsten2, post: 925792, member: 89973"] Possible bug in the History graph calculation - see screenshot. MAX=13, MIN=8 but the graph shows around 5.5 as average - which is impossible. It has to be between 8 and 13, right? Or have I misinterpreted the graph? I guess it could also be an error in the data feed from the provider. [ATTACH=full]113299[/ATTACH] EDIT: I did some more investigation - basically checked the provider data. So I can see there is no calculations done - so no bug ;) As far as I can see [B]Average MAX[/B] is used in the chart for 2008 and [B]Mean Temperature[/B] for the other years (which I think is correct). [ATTACH=full]113301[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification