Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Laban" data-source="post: 162365" data-attributes="member: 53075">MP + this plugin doesn't import channels without an existing mapping. Unless the name matches perfectly with an existing channel. Edit: Or perhaps i should say that the import itself doesn't import channels like the standard xmltv plugin does, unless there isn't an existing mapping and the name in MP matches the guidename exactly. I guess it's not exactly a import either, it just maps it automatically to the existing MP channel. Though i wonder if it wouldn't be a good idea to actually remove that &quot;feature&quot;. Don't really see a reason for using it since it's so easy to do the mappings. Especially if you know that the names in the guide matches exactly with the autotune names. But it would perhaps still be a good idea to have a export feature. Would speed up the grabbing a bit. Not that it's really a performance issue (guess the same could be for the actual import), but it can't hurt..</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Laban, post: 162365, member: 53075"] MP + this plugin doesn't import channels without an existing mapping. Unless the name matches perfectly with an existing channel. Edit: Or perhaps i should say that the import itself doesn't import channels like the standard xmltv plugin does, unless there isn't an existing mapping and the name in MP matches the guidename exactly. I guess it's not exactly a import either, it just maps it automatically to the existing MP channel. Though i wonder if it wouldn't be a good idea to actually remove that "feature". Don't really see a reason for using it since it's so easy to do the mappings. Especially if you know that the names in the guide matches exactly with the autotune names. But it would perhaps still be a good idea to have a export feature. Would speed up the grabbing a bit. Not that it's really a performance issue (guess the same could be for the actual import), but it can't hurt.. [/QUOTE]

Verification