Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hello_joe" data-source="post: 987666" data-attributes="member: 139074">Hello again&nbsp;As previously mentioned, I've never used WinTV but I'll do my best to try and follow.&nbsp;So to be clear, are you saying that 65.194 is a real channel number?In other words, when you switch to that channel on your TV, is that the number that you enter on your remote?&nbsp;When I look at the WinTV channel list and compare it with the tv.log I can easily find those channels. For example, 65.194:Okay, so admittedly 66 is not equal to 65 (so either MP or WinTV are out by one there)... but I wouldn't have called that a real ATSC channel number. They are just there to help you distinguish the channel from all the other &quot;Unknown&quot; channels.&nbsp;WinTV is presenting &quot;&lt;physical channel&gt;.&lt;service ID&gt;&quot; as a way to help you to identify the channel.MP is presenting &quot;&lt;frequency&gt;.&lt;hexadecimal service ID&gt;&quot; (where 0xc2 converted to decimal is 194).&nbsp;Are you saying that:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">the number that Hauppauge presents is more helpful?</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">MP is wrong?</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">???</li>
</ul>Clearly MP could give the same information as WinTV. I guess the MP team just thought the number they're presenting is more helpful.&nbsp;I pointed out 65.194 above.Here are the other channels that I can see in your screenshot, all the same (with the exception of physical channel)...94.195&nbsp;62.197&nbsp;80.399&nbsp;How are you testing?The &quot;preview&quot; function in TV Server configuration is not the most reliable way to test.I suggest you <a href="http://wiki.team-mediaportal.com/1_MEDIAPORTAL_1/141_Configuration/MediaPortal_Configuration/9_Codecs_and_Renderer/1_TV_Codecs" target="_blank">configure your codecs</a> and test in MP. I'd be surprised if the channels don't work.&nbsp;Joe</blockquote>

[QUOTE="hello_joe, post: 987666, member: 139074"] Hello again As previously mentioned, I've never used WinTV but I'll do my best to try and follow. So to be clear, are you saying that 65.194 is a real channel number? In other words, when you switch to that channel on your TV, is that the number that you enter on your remote? When I look at the WinTV channel list and compare it with the tv.log I can easily find those channels. For example, 65.194: Okay, so admittedly 66 is not equal to 65 (so either MP or WinTV are out by one there)... but I wouldn't have called that a real ATSC channel number. They are just there to help you distinguish the channel from all the other "Unknown" channels. WinTV is presenting "<physical channel>.<service ID>" as a way to help you to identify the channel. MP is presenting "<frequency>.<hexadecimal service ID>" (where 0xc2 converted to decimal is 194). Are you saying that: [LIST] [*]the number that Hauppauge presents is more helpful? [*]MP is wrong? [*]??? [/LIST] Clearly MP could give the same information as WinTV. I guess the MP team just thought the number they're presenting is more helpful. I pointed out 65.194 above. Here are the other channels that I can see in your screenshot, all the same (with the exception of physical channel)... 94.195 62.197 80.399 How are you testing? The "preview" function in TV Server configuration is not the most reliable way to test. I suggest you [URL='http://wiki.team-mediaportal.com/1_MEDIAPORTAL_1/141_Configuration/MediaPortal_Configuration/9_Codecs_and_Renderer/1_TV_Codecs']configure your codecs[/URL] and test in MP. I'd be surprised if the channels don't work. Joe [/QUOTE]

Verification