home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
44100hz vs 48000hz - Upsampling vs Downsampling
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 479848" data-attributes="member: 10858"><p>Isn't it pretty sad that the only(?) audio card that is able to bitstream the Blu-ray high end formats directly to the receiver is not able to chose the output frequency on it's own? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>I might go with the upsampling to 192k choice (true, upsampling wont create any better sounding output than the original) as 44.1k to 192k upsampiling is most likely not creating as bad artefacts as the much smaller scale downsampling from 48 to 44.1. Its always much harder to upsample / downsample (resize with video) when the source and destination are close to each other.</p><p></p><p>Best way would be to ask Asus why their drivers wont allow automatic selection for the output frequency. The send best would be to test all the different choices and pick the one that sounds best to your ears.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 479848, member: 10858"] Isn't it pretty sad that the only(?) audio card that is able to bitstream the Blu-ray high end formats directly to the receiver is not able to chose the output frequency on it's own? :P I might go with the upsampling to 192k choice (true, upsampling wont create any better sounding output than the original) as 44.1k to 192k upsampiling is most likely not creating as bad artefacts as the much smaller scale downsampling from 48 to 44.1. Its always much harder to upsample / downsample (resize with video) when the source and destination are close to each other. Best way would be to ask Asus why their drivers wont allow automatic selection for the output frequency. The send best would be to test all the different choices and pick the one that sounds best to your ears. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
44100hz vs 48000hz - Upsampling vs Downsampling
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom