Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 608222" data-attributes="member: 10858">Sure, my mistake... that was some old screen shot with the SVN DLL. Please find the correct screen shot attached. When that screenshot was taken the video did stutter approx once or twice per second (stuttering is most easy to see when tearing test bar is enabled <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />).Also the estimated refresh cycle is WAY OFF in that. 23.931ms vs the real 20 ms. That measuring code (taken from MPC-HC / ar-jar's renderer <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />) is not accurate at all (ar-jar is not using it by himself anymore <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />).btw. please add some log message to the new DLL so we can distinguish it easialy so that people aren't reporting bugs with it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 608222, member: 10858"] Sure, my mistake... that was some old screen shot with the SVN DLL. Please find the correct screen shot attached. When that screenshot was taken the video did stutter approx once or twice per second (stuttering is most easy to see when tearing test bar is enabled :)). Also the estimated refresh cycle is WAY OFF in that. 23.931ms vs the real 20 ms. That measuring code (taken from MPC-HC / ar-jar's renderer :)) is not accurate at all (ar-jar is not using it by himself anymore :)). btw. please add some log message to the new DLL so we can distinguish it easialy so that people aren't reporting bugs with it :) [/QUOTE]

Verification