Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rtv" data-source="post: 517543" data-attributes="member: 12309">Despite the issues tourettes lined out I just realize that even some team members do not &quot;know&quot; that their wishes can be done with MP. This leads me to two conclusions:1. The music part could already have too many features as only few people invest the time to get the maximum out of it (Yeah - even backdrops are easily doable without any codechange. I myself however wouldn't like to watch the 500x500px images on a 100&quot; screen).2. The USER documentation is certainly worse than poor. Of course the wiki explains the basic stuff. Of course some people here earn a lot of credits to explain the database views and how to configure them almost weekly. Of course I really like sophisticated feedback (e.g. sometimes from Helios61) pointing out what we can NOT do. However I think that those people who complain the loudest wouldn't even read a perfect documentation if it means to read more than just one page. This is frustrating for the devs who try to investigate every feature request. This is frustrating for the supporters who do step by step guides. This is frustrating for the users trying to advertise their requests and why they would be useful.In the end there is no &quot;win&quot; situation for anyone. So please try to stay open minded and respect every other poster in this thread. Share your ideas but think before you post <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="rtv, post: 517543, member: 12309"] Despite the issues tourettes lined out I just realize that even some team members do not "know" that their wishes can be done with MP. This leads me to two conclusions: 1. The music part could already have too many features as only few people invest the time to get the maximum out of it (Yeah - even backdrops are easily doable without any codechange. I myself however wouldn't like to watch the 500x500px images on a 100" screen). 2. The USER documentation is certainly worse than poor. Of course the wiki explains the basic stuff. Of course some people here earn a lot of credits to explain the database views and how to configure them almost weekly. Of course I really like sophisticated feedback (e.g. sometimes from Helios61) pointing out what we can NOT do. However I think that those people who complain the loudest wouldn't even read a perfect documentation if it means to read more than just one page. This is frustrating for the devs who try to investigate every feature request. This is frustrating for the supporters who do step by step guides. This is frustrating for the users trying to advertise their requests and why they would be useful. In the end there is no "win" situation for anyone. So please try to stay open minded and respect every other poster in this thread. Share your ideas but think before you post ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification