home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
Alternative to WMP as generic music player
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rsbrux" data-source="post: 210064" data-attributes="member: 49539"><p>Thanks for the tip, but <a href="http://www.mediamonkey.com/mediamonkey_de.htm" target="_blank">MediaMonkey </a>seems like a lot more than I need. It appears to be a full-featured replacement for WMP. In particular, it maintains its own DB, something I already didn't like about WMP. To its credit though, it seems much cleaner and more economical of resources than WMP. One advantage of the Windows MC/WMP combination was that they at least used the same DB. Now that I've opted for MP in place of (the unusable) WMC), I don't want an additional DB if I can avoid it.</p><p>Even <a href="http://www.winamp.com/player" target="_blank">Winamp</a>, which used to be a simple, small-footprint player seems to be succumbing to feature creep in the latest version (5.5). Its setup program is almost twice as big as MediaMonkey's!</p><p>I'm now looking at <a href="http://www.foobar2000.org/" target="_blank">foobar2000</a>, which is the smallest freeware/shareware contender I've found so far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rsbrux, post: 210064, member: 49539"] Thanks for the tip, but [URL="http://www.mediamonkey.com/mediamonkey_de.htm"]MediaMonkey [/URL]seems like a lot more than I need. It appears to be a full-featured replacement for WMP. In particular, it maintains its own DB, something I already didn't like about WMP. To its credit though, it seems much cleaner and more economical of resources than WMP. One advantage of the Windows MC/WMP combination was that they at least used the same DB. Now that I've opted for MP in place of (the unusable) WMC), I don't want an additional DB if I can avoid it. Even [URL="http://www.winamp.com/player"]Winamp[/URL], which used to be a simple, small-footprint player seems to be succumbing to feature creep in the latest version (5.5). Its setup program is almost twice as big as MediaMonkey's! I'm now looking at [URL="http://www.foobar2000.org/"]foobar2000[/URL], which is the smallest freeware/shareware contender I've found so far. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
Alternative to WMP as generic music player
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom