Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Guzzi" data-source="post: 599805" data-attributes="member: 55213">AW: Re : AW: Re : AMC Updater v0.8.0 Now Available!Hi Zebons,I think you misunderstood me - you are completely right, that AMCupdater should detect &quot;moves&quot; of an existing movie - and it did it in the past and does it with current version - properly updating the movies existing record in this case.I am talking about a bug, when adding a new additional movie - when using internetdetails while importing (OFDB in my case).Physically it's a new separate movie in different path and with different filename - just same OriginalTitle found with scraper - and that seems to cause a problem (while it worked fine in the past).In this case it should ADD the movie and not update thge record of the old movie (that is still there).I have added you an example - two moviefolder (before and after) plus the two ANT-DBs - before and after scanning - where you can see, that adding a &quot;T2 - director's cut&quot; replaced record #2 (&quot;T2&quot;) instead of adding a record #4.This was working fine with 0.8.x versions.Thanks foir your support,Guzzi</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Guzzi, post: 599805, member: 55213"] [b]AW: Re : AW: Re : AMC Updater v0.8.0 Now Available![/b] Hi Zebons, I think you misunderstood me - you are completely right, that AMCupdater should detect "moves" of an existing movie - and it did it in the past and does it with current version - properly updating the movies existing record in this case. I am talking about a bug, when adding a new additional movie - when using internetdetails while importing (OFDB in my case). Physically it's a new separate movie in different path and with different filename - just same OriginalTitle found with scraper - and that seems to cause a problem (while it worked fine in the past). In this case it should ADD the movie and not update thge record of the old movie (that is still there). I have added you an example - two moviefolder (before and after) plus the two ANT-DBs - before and after scanning - where you can see, that adding a "T2 - director's cut" replaced record #2 ("T2") instead of adding a record #4. This was working fine with 0.8.x versions. Thanks foir your support, Guzzi [/QUOTE]

Verification