Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kjegibbons" data-source="post: 970350" data-attributes="member: 113063">That makes two of us. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp;IMO, I think it would be better to completely re-design the skin from scratch rather than trying to &quot;reverse engineer&quot; the existing files......it would probably be quicker and easier to start from fresh.&nbsp;The files work but are far from ideal...personally, I don't think the &quot;icons&quot; view works for this as there are too many blank entries and the files seem to be overly complicated for what they need to achieve...they made my head ache. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="kjegibbons, post: 970350, member: 113063"] That makes two of us. :) IMO, I think it would be better to completely re-design the skin from scratch rather than trying to "reverse engineer" the existing files......it would probably be quicker and easier to start from fresh. The files work but are far from ideal...personally, I don't think the "icons" view works for this as there are too many blank entries and the files seem to be overly complicated for what they need to achieve...they made my head ache. :( [/QUOTE]

Verification