Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 785638" data-attributes="member: 82144">Hi againAs I said in my earlier post, SD doesn't work that way. It *only* looks at the call sign. I have no idea why that is but I guess there must be a reason. I'm curious: why do you say it isn't intuitive? When you refer to a channel, what do you say? Over here we use channel names like &quot;Prime&quot; or &quot;TV One&quot; rather than call signs or channel numbers so I'd be interested to know what you consider &quot;normal&quot;.Great <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />For the people who aren't able to manually update their database: are you able to confirm that if you'd named the channels with just the call sign then the mapping would have been created automatically?According to what I read in the code, it should leave it alone... but then I'm not an SD expert.mm</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 785638, member: 82144"] Hi again As I said in my earlier post, SD doesn't work that way. It *only* looks at the call sign. I have no idea why that is but I guess there must be a reason. I'm curious: why do you say it isn't intuitive? When you refer to a channel, what do you say? Over here we use channel names like "Prime" or "TV One" rather than call signs or channel numbers so I'd be interested to know what you consider "normal". Great :) For the people who aren't able to manually update their database: are you able to confirm that if you'd named the channels with just the call sign then the mapping would have been created automatically? According to what I read in the code, it should leave it alone... but then I'm not an SD expert. mm [/QUOTE]

Verification