home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Best picture quality in Vista with Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kszabo" data-source="post: 313227" data-attributes="member: 61646"><p>1. 25 fps is normal for deinterlaced PAL material (it has 50 half frames). The fps depends on deinterlacing method: the very primitive "bob" makes 50 from it, good deinterlacer 25 fps. This is not a quality marker.</p><p></p><p>2. the Phenom X3 8450, if undervolted has much less than 95 Watt TPD. First because you have 1 core less active (same X4 2,1 GHz, same architecture has also 95 W rating). Second you have ca. 12% less voltage (1,1 instead 1,25). The new X3 9100e with 65 Watt TPD has the same architecture and production technology, only downvolted to 1,1 V Vcore.</p><p></p><p>I am sorry that I cannot measure my TPD for you. But if you preefer, wait for the next generation of AMDs, with 45 nm production. </p><p></p><p>45W TPD and 10% usage does not mean 4,5 Watt because of the integrated RAM controller. The relation is not linear.</p><p></p><p>EDIT:</p><p>here is a test: <a href="http://www.pcwelt.de/start/computer/prozessor/tests/174426/amd_phenom_x4_9950_black_edition/" target="_blank">http://www.pcwelt.de/start/computer/prozessor/tests/174426/amd_phenom_x4_9950_black_edition/</a></p><p>a test platform with a X4 9100e (TPD 65W) has the same maximal total energy consumption as with X3 8450 (203 Watts total). So a X3 8450 is rather a 65W CPA than a 90W. And if I undervolt it...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kszabo, post: 313227, member: 61646"] 1. 25 fps is normal for deinterlaced PAL material (it has 50 half frames). The fps depends on deinterlacing method: the very primitive "bob" makes 50 from it, good deinterlacer 25 fps. This is not a quality marker. 2. the Phenom X3 8450, if undervolted has much less than 95 Watt TPD. First because you have 1 core less active (same X4 2,1 GHz, same architecture has also 95 W rating). Second you have ca. 12% less voltage (1,1 instead 1,25). The new X3 9100e with 65 Watt TPD has the same architecture and production technology, only downvolted to 1,1 V Vcore. I am sorry that I cannot measure my TPD for you. But if you preefer, wait for the next generation of AMDs, with 45 nm production. 45W TPD and 10% usage does not mean 4,5 Watt because of the integrated RAM controller. The relation is not linear. EDIT: here is a test: [URL="http://www.pcwelt.de/start/computer/prozessor/tests/174426/amd_phenom_x4_9950_black_edition/"]http://www.pcwelt.de/start/computer/prozessor/tests/174426/amd_phenom_x4_9950_black_edition/[/URL] a test platform with a X4 9100e (TPD 65W) has the same maximal total energy consumption as with X3 8450 (203 Watts total). So a X3 8450 is rather a 65W CPA than a 90W. And if I undervolt it... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Best picture quality in Vista with Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom