Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="iancalderban" data-source="post: 384290" data-attributes="member: 85629">Thats exactly same sort of 1080i tha I am watching. I'm not familiar with nvidia's drivers in this territory, does it tell you what type of deinterlace you are getting? Or are you, from your visual test, happy that its adaptive? However I just spent an hour googling the manufacturers , I can't see anyone makes a fanless low-profile nv9400GT. Rereading avsforums I am thinking probably ATI HD4550, as it can be had in versions that are both low-profile and fanless , and its not a lot of cash outlay either , similar to the 9400GT (lot less than a phenom!). And the time I won't have to spend changing drivers from ATI to Nvidia is worth some $ also... The various discussions on avsforum suggest that the vector adaptive does work on the 4550 card, (providing you only use one display, which is not a restriction for typical htpc user at all).cheers,Ian</blockquote>

[QUOTE="iancalderban, post: 384290, member: 85629"] Thats exactly same sort of 1080i tha I am watching. I'm not familiar with nvidia's drivers in this territory, does it tell you what type of deinterlace you are getting? Or are you, from your visual test, happy that its adaptive? However I just spent an hour googling the manufacturers , I can't see anyone makes a fanless low-profile nv9400GT. Rereading avsforums I am thinking probably ATI HD4550, as it can be had in versions that are both low-profile and fanless , and its not a lot of cash outlay either , similar to the 9400GT (lot less than a phenom!). And the time I won't have to spend changing drivers from ATI to Nvidia is worth some $ also... The various discussions on avsforum suggest that the vector adaptive does work on the 4550 card, (providing you only use one display, which is not a restriction for typical htpc user at all). cheers, Ian [/QUOTE]

Verification