home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Installation, configuration support
Brightness Level
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigj" data-source="post: 234706" data-attributes="member: 10940"><p>Well that is my thought. The only (maybe) benefit of letting display do it is that expanding in analog domain or with >8 bit precision may be better. e.g. say a notional display expands to 16bit then it would expand 16-235 by linear interpolation to a range with (smooth) 64K steps. But if you do it source side on the PC in 8bits then you can only expand to 256 steps, and this would then be expanded *again* on display side to 64K. I think this double expansion/quantisation may lead to theoretical artifacts. But if it *is* there it is a) dependent on exactly what the display does, b) probably pretty marginal anyway. All the same, people do talk of banding...</p><p></p><p></p><p>You can achieve the expansion using contrast and brigtness adjustments, which pretty much all displays support!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed, HW acceleration is too important.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day I agree that expansion on source side is the only option for HTPC. And to be honest I think the argument about banding is overstated - I still can't see that overlay (or EVR) expansion is any different and people seem to think that's the bees knees...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigj, post: 234706, member: 10940"] Well that is my thought. The only (maybe) benefit of letting display do it is that expanding in analog domain or with >8 bit precision may be better. e.g. say a notional display expands to 16bit then it would expand 16-235 by linear interpolation to a range with (smooth) 64K steps. But if you do it source side on the PC in 8bits then you can only expand to 256 steps, and this would then be expanded *again* on display side to 64K. I think this double expansion/quantisation may lead to theoretical artifacts. But if it *is* there it is a) dependent on exactly what the display does, b) probably pretty marginal anyway. All the same, people do talk of banding... You can achieve the expansion using contrast and brigtness adjustments, which pretty much all displays support! Agreed, HW acceleration is too important. At the end of the day I agree that expansion on source side is the only option for HTPC. And to be honest I think the argument about banding is overstated - I still can't see that overlay (or EVR) expansion is any different and people seem to think that's the bees knees... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Installation, configuration support
Brightness Level
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom