home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
Building a File & data server
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joz" data-source="post: 415917" data-attributes="member: 70244"><p>That would give you 2/3 of the capacity, like always with RAID-5. All the drives can go in the array. If one fails you can just hot-swap a new one in there and the array will rebuild itself (not sure you would have to reboot for that)</p><p></p><p></p><p>This would not be my first choice. This will sincerely limit the HD throughput. Software RAID also has CPU overhead compared to RAID controllers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joz, post: 415917, member: 70244"] That would give you 2/3 of the capacity, like always with RAID-5. All the drives can go in the array. If one fails you can just hot-swap a new one in there and the array will rebuild itself (not sure you would have to reboot for that) This would not be my first choice. This will sincerely limit the HD throughput. Software RAID also has CPU overhead compared to RAID controllers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
Building a File & data server
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
