Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Djang" data-source="post: 231461" data-attributes="member: 59531">I have my Media Portal setup and tested out almost every possible codec.Now it's a showdown between CoreAVC and PowerDVD for mkv files. both work very well.Only PowerDVD doesn't work with the the Vista improvement thingy (lost the name) and CoreAVC does.In the early days I heard allot people praising PowerDVD.Untill now I've seen that CoreAVC uses 20% less recources then PowerDVD on my system.When I try to compare the quality I can't find any difference. The problem is that I've never used CoreAVC before, so I don't know if it's any good or that there are common problems with it compared to PowerDVD.Like I said before: both work like a charm but I can't decide which one would be better <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite10" alt=":oops:" title="Oops!&nbsp; &nbsp; :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Djang, post: 231461, member: 59531"] I have my Media Portal setup and tested out almost every possible codec. Now it's a showdown between CoreAVC and PowerDVD for mkv files. both work very well. Only PowerDVD doesn't work with the the Vista improvement thingy (lost the name) and CoreAVC does. In the early days I heard allot people praising PowerDVD. Untill now I've seen that CoreAVC uses 20% less recources then PowerDVD on my system. When I try to compare the quality I can't find any difference. The problem is that I've never used CoreAVC before, so I don't know if it's any good or that there are common problems with it compared to PowerDVD. Like I said before: both work like a charm but I can't decide which one would be better :ooops: [/QUOTE]

Verification