Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oxan" data-source="post: 854708" data-attributes="member: 97484">I don't think this is the correct forum, but anyway:You're really comparing apples with oranges here. An iPod is musicplayer, while most (all?) Android phones are smartphones. iPods don't have features like 3G and GPS. If you want to make a fair comparison, you'd have to compare the Android phones with the iPhone. &nbsp;No.Both Apple and Android fanboys say their own OS is better. For the average user there isn't a real difference in my experience. Depends on what you want to do. For listening music and remote controlling your MP, everything available today is powerful enough. If you want to watch 1080p videos, you obviously would need a more high-end range processor. You've paid and free apps for both platforms.Yes.Yes, all of them (except some very cheap Chinese stuff). Resistive screens are almost extinct nowadays, so I wouldn't worry too much about a screen type. Most of them (I think &gt;95% nowadays) do.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oxan, post: 854708, member: 97484"] I don't think this is the correct forum, but anyway: You're really comparing apples with oranges here. An iPod is musicplayer, while most (all?) Android phones are smartphones. iPods don't have features like 3G and GPS. If you want to make a fair comparison, you'd have to compare the Android phones with the iPhone. No. Both Apple and Android fanboys say their own OS is better. For the average user there isn't a real difference in my experience. Depends on what you want to do. For listening music and remote controlling your MP, everything available today is powerful enough. If you want to watch 1080p videos, you obviously would need a more high-end range processor. You've paid and free apps for both platforms. Yes. Yes, all of them (except some very cheap Chinese stuff). Resistive screens are almost extinct nowadays, so I wouldn't worry too much about a screen type. Most of them (I think >95% nowadays) do. [/QUOTE]

Verification