home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
General
FireDTV / FloppyDTV and NDS (Videoguard)
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pierremenard" data-source="post: 99860" data-attributes="member: 19559"><p>Mmmh, so maybe it's better to have a regular decoder from sky, quality could be worse (digital->analog->digital and no ac3 audio) but less time to lose...</p><p></p><p>Thank you for the reply!</p><p></p><p>F.</p><p></p><p>p.s. anyway, next year sky bouquet will be probably broadcasted in internet and new possibilities would come. As sky is the monopolist in satellite broadcasting has to let telecom provider to sell channel packages of its content.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pierremenard, post: 99860, member: 19559"] Mmmh, so maybe it's better to have a regular decoder from sky, quality could be worse (digital->analog->digital and no ac3 audio) but less time to lose... Thank you for the reply! F. p.s. anyway, next year sky bouquet will be probably broadcasted in internet and new possibilities would come. As sky is the monopolist in satellite broadcasting has to let telecom provider to sell channel packages of its content. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
General
FireDTV / FloppyDTV and NDS (Videoguard)
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
