home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Future directions of MediaPortal
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="janjuul" data-source="post: 123888" data-attributes="member: 41091"><p>Hi James,</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm pleased that you can see that I have good intentions. And I'm not telling anyone that they are crazy... neither am I giving any individuals critics. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>To me this is part of an open conversation in an open world (and I'm not trying to discuss politics).</p><p>But let me rephrase my questions around mediaextenders: </p><p>- Is there a reason why 'MediaExtenders' hasn't been thought into the current big rework/development ? </p><p>I would hate to see that the team would have to build a new protocol again, in order to support mediaextenders, or even have to decide not to support mediaextenders as it will require too much rework !!</p><p></p><p>But sadly my questioning around some of the current directions is automatically seen as me being destructive. </p><p>I might not be a polished politician, who bless every initiative as long as it makes me popular, but doesn't really care at the end of the day. </p><p>I do actually care, and think that I'm raising some key questions about where and how the future direction of Mediaportal is determined.</p><p></p><p>Jan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="janjuul, post: 123888, member: 41091"] Hi James, I'm pleased that you can see that I have good intentions. And I'm not telling anyone that they are crazy... neither am I giving any individuals critics. ;) To me this is part of an open conversation in an open world (and I'm not trying to discuss politics). But let me rephrase my questions around mediaextenders: - Is there a reason why 'MediaExtenders' hasn't been thought into the current big rework/development ? I would hate to see that the team would have to build a new protocol again, in order to support mediaextenders, or even have to decide not to support mediaextenders as it will require too much rework !! But sadly my questioning around some of the current directions is automatically seen as me being destructive. I might not be a polished politician, who bless every initiative as long as it makes me popular, but doesn't really care at the end of the day. I do actually care, and think that I'm raising some key questions about where and how the future direction of Mediaportal is determined. Jan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Future directions of MediaPortal
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom