Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RoChess" data-source="post: 820111" data-attributes="member: 18896">More then likely those titles were still linked to the default imdb.com scraper then. The &quot;IMDb+ Info&quot; method can show you if any movie is still using an alternative scraper-script. You can refresh all you want then, but it will not be corrected then via IMDb+ scraper-script.However sending it back to the importer with IMDb+ configured in primary/first position will then fix it as well, but you then loose watched flag and date-of-import data. This why the &quot;Force IMDb+&quot; function was added to the IMDb+ plugin so you could switch movies over to start using the IMDb+ scraper-script without loosing that.Either way, glad you got it solved, that's all that matters <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="RoChess, post: 820111, member: 18896"] More then likely those titles were still linked to the default imdb.com scraper then. The "IMDb+ Info" method can show you if any movie is still using an alternative scraper-script. You can refresh all you want then, but it will not be corrected then via IMDb+ scraper-script. However sending it back to the importer with IMDb+ configured in primary/first position will then fix it as well, but you then loose watched flag and date-of-import data. This why the "Force IMDb+" function was added to the IMDb+ plugin so you could switch movies over to start using the IMDb+ scraper-script without loosing that. Either way, glad you got it solved, that's all that matters :) [/QUOTE]

Verification