home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Software
Tools and other software
HandBrake for MKV recoding
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stéphane Lenclud" data-source="post: 1165641" data-attributes="member: 140174"><p>I used MakeMKV to rip a Blu Ray and then proceed to use <a href="https://handbrake.fr/" target="_blank">HandBrake</a> to perform the video recoding to save disk space.</p><p>Here I'm sharing some results depending of the CQ selected. The source was a video lasting some 2 hours and 7 minutes.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Original MKV: 32.8 GB</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">CQ 20: 9.61 GB</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">CQ 22: 7.35 GB</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>CQ 23: 6.63 GB</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">CQ 23 cropped: 6.56 GB</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">CQ 24 cropped: 6.03 GB</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">CQ 28: 5.08 GB</li> </ul><p>I've decided to stick to CQ 23 without cropping as it seems to be the best trade off between quality and file size.</p><p>H.264 recommends using a CQ between 20 and 23. For that one movie however CQ23 saves you 3GB over CQ20 and I could not really tell the difference quality-wise.</p><p>The sample marked 'cropped' above are the ones where the video black strips where removed during recoding. I find that provided only a marginal file size improvement and thus decided against using this feature and instead stick to the original video frame size.</p><p></p><p>Find attached the exported HandBrake profile I'm planning to keep on using for Blu-ray backup.</p><p>I was using HandBrake v0.10.2.7286 64 bit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stéphane Lenclud, post: 1165641, member: 140174"] I used MakeMKV to rip a Blu Ray and then proceed to use [URL='https://handbrake.fr/']HandBrake[/URL] to perform the video recoding to save disk space. Here I'm sharing some results depending of the CQ selected. The source was a video lasting some 2 hours and 7 minutes. [LIST] [*]Original MKV: 32.8 GB [*]CQ 20: 9.61 GB [*]CQ 22: 7.35 GB [*][B]CQ 23: 6.63 GB[/B] [*]CQ 23 cropped: 6.56 GB [*]CQ 24 cropped: 6.03 GB [*]CQ 28: 5.08 GB [/LIST] I've decided to stick to CQ 23 without cropping as it seems to be the best trade off between quality and file size. H.264 recommends using a CQ between 20 and 23. For that one movie however CQ23 saves you 3GB over CQ20 and I could not really tell the difference quality-wise. The sample marked 'cropped' above are the ones where the video black strips where removed during recoding. I find that provided only a marginal file size improvement and thus decided against using this feature and instead stick to the original video frame size. Find attached the exported HandBrake profile I'm planning to keep on using for Blu-ray backup. I was using HandBrake v0.10.2.7286 64 bit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Software
Tools and other software
HandBrake for MKV recoding
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom