Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="flintstone99" data-source="post: 836127" data-attributes="member: 72866">AW: Re: Hardware for Server running WHS 2011, TVServer, ExchangeServer and being a NAHi,while I am running WHS V1 and not the 2011 one, my server specs should work for you too. I have hmailserver running on thatbox, 3HDDs connected with more SATA ports available, 1PCIe dual DVB S TVcard and a USB DVB S2 card.Serves as a file server (&quot;NAS&quot;) and usually is far below 15% CPU load. Actually 15%peaks&nbsp; occur only when I stream a HD channel to one client and another SD stream to another client. The driveextendermigrator services causes a lot more load, but you do not have that on WHS 2011.Nowadays there is the E-450 but I read that improvements are mostly on the graphics side which you will not need at all in a server. the 2GB RAM is totally sufficient for me.See the specs in the signature and the &quot;MY System&quot; linkregardsflintstone</blockquote>

[QUOTE="flintstone99, post: 836127, member: 72866"] [b]AW: Re: Hardware for Server running WHS 2011, TVServer, ExchangeServer and being a NA[/b] Hi, while I am running WHS V1 and not the 2011 one, my server specs should work for you too. I have hmailserver running on thatbox, 3HDDs connected with more SATA ports available, 1PCIe dual DVB S TVcard and a USB DVB S2 card. Serves as a file server ("NAS") and usually is far below 15% CPU load. Actually 15%peaks occur only when I stream a HD channel to one client and another SD stream to another client. The driveextendermigrator services causes a lot more load, but you do not have that on WHS 2011. Nowadays there is the E-450 but I read that improvements are mostly on the graphics side which you will not need at all in a server. the 2GB RAM is totally sufficient for me. See the specs in the signature and the "MY System" link regards flintstone [/QUOTE]

Verification